|
|
common law patent
Posted by . updated on 6/20/2002
As a photographer, I conceived the idea of a ''pop up'' dressing room for models. As far as I knew, none existed. Through drawings and email communications, I designed a product and contracted a factory in Asia to manufacture it. I received a cease and decist letter from another person, claiming that I have infringed on his patent. We both have web sites advertising our product. His product is very similar to mine, but differs in dimensions, fabric, and door opening. I also believe that his design has a floor - mine does not. Do I have a ''common law patent'', since I did not copy the other design. What is your opinion? Thank you!
Answers (1)
| |
|
Edward ...
|
There is no such thing as a "common law patent". You either have a patent issued by the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) or you don't. Now, just because the other inventor has a patent does not mean that you have violated it. Patents are intricate documents which go into some detail about what has been patented; if your invention differs enough from his, then you may not have infringed. Differences like those you list -- dimensions, fabric, door openings and the presence of a floor -- seem unlikely to be significant. After all, what good would it do to patent any invention if someone could get around your patent just by changing the dimensions? Even you admit that the inventions are very similar, and the PTO is likely to agree. It may also be that you are the first inventor and that he simply obtained a patent before you bothered to. If you can prove your priority, you might be able to have his patent invalidated and even obtain one for yourself. There are other ways to attack his patent. For example, you could argue that his invention actually falls within the scope of another, older patent. You could argue that his invention was obvious from the existing state of the art and thus not worthy of a patent. There are other such arguments that could be made. The problem for you is that most of these arguments would undercut your own position as well -- if the other invention isn't patentable and yours is very similar, then yours likely isn't patentable either. Any of these approaches is likely to be *very* costly, and you will need a qualified lawyer if you intend to fight. This is a good example of why inventors should make sure what patents are out there and try to secure their own patent *before* getting too far into the process.
|
|
Related Questions
 |
I designed a software system for a company , the IP & copywrite was understood belong to me, there were no contracts other than a PO. - several years later I find the company is trying to patent my idea /IP ... Read More
|
 |
I am planning to start an internet based company that will be creating a game very similar in look, idea and functionality to that of another major game developer. The main difference is that this game devel... Read More
|
 |
If a employee of a company were to create a product to be sold by the company, then the emloyee left the company to sell said product on his own forming his own comapny, would the company have any legal grou... Read More
|
 |
Will a Poor Mans Patent (Meaning a picture of patent product sent through the u.s. mail unopened and post marked sent back to the sender) have any validity in a court? Read More
|
 |
I have two questions concerning copyrights and patents. It seems that every time a movie studio has a successful movie, someone yells that the studio stole the story from him, such as in the case of the movi... Read More
|
|
Next question: Invention >>
- Patent Express is the fastest and easiest way for an individual inventor to file a U.S. Patent or Trademark Application.
- Patent Express fills the gap for those who cannot afford a U.S. patent attorney or agent, but want to have their patent drafted and issued.
- Patent Express is backed by a 100% money back guarantee.
|