|
|
Terminal disclaimer
Posted by Anonymous . updated on 4/7/2011
I have some claims that are allowed by the Examiner and some that are rejected under non-statutory obviousness-type double patenting. Is it still a best practice to cancel the rejected calims to have the application allowed, and file a divisional for the rejected claims with a terminal disclaimer? Won't it be sufficient to file a TD due to the change to 20 year patent term?
Answers (0)
Be the first to answer this question.
Related Questions
 |
I was reading an article about a discovery made by a professor. While reading it, I came up with an application of the discovery that could be very successful. What are the approaches that I can use to get m... Read More |
|
This is to clarify a question that I asked earlier. I was reading an article about an invention made by a professor. While reading it, I came up with an application of the invention that could be very succes... Read More |
|
re: patenting an application Given that a technology has become protected under patent, and other, law, can an application of that technology be patented by someone other than the owner of the original techn... Read More |
|
sir, i am a docter,i have done( bams),and now i want to make a helicopter;with the help of some part of motorbike,so is any law which can stop me to do particular work.and 2nd thing i am not using any one''s... Read More |
|
what forms do i need to file a patent Read More |
|
- Patent Express is the fastest and easiest way for an individual inventor to file a U.S. Patent or Trademark Application.
- Patent Express fills the gap for those who cannot afford a U.S. patent attorney or agent, but want to have their patent drafted and issued.
- Patent Express is backed by a 100% money back guarantee.
|